<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>FolkWolf.Net: The economics of the Peloton</title>
    <link>http://blog.folkwolf.net/articles/2006/08/22/the-economics-of-the-peloton</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description></description>
    <item>
      <title>The economics of the Peloton</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This article is one of the best explanations of why cycling is at once the most interesting, and the most boring of all sports.  Plus, there's two stories in it that had me laugh out loud.
&lt;a href="http://money.cnn.com/2006/05/26/magazines/fortune/peloton_greatteams_fortune_0612/index.htm"&gt;Pack Mentality&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:54:04 -0400</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:b58a9f52-d536-4948-be25-066d2555b788</guid>
      <author>Matt Rose</author>
      <link>http://blog.folkwolf.net/articles/2006/08/22/the-economics-of-the-peloton</link>
      <category>personal</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
